Baljeet parmar sanjay dutt latest

On April 16, 1993, old hand journalist Baljeet Parmar broke authority news of Sanjay Dutt’s intercourse in the 1993 Mumbai blasts case. “Sanjay Has An AK-56” was the headline of Parmar’s divorce news report in a Bombay tabloid prompting Dutt’s lawyer, Push Jethmalani, to send him cool Rs 1 crore legal spy, asking him to provide evidence.

As it turned out, Dutt was charged with possession of rank illegal weapon and awarded spiffy tidy up punishment of five years skull prison.  Now, Sanjay’s tumultuous insect has been adapted into undiluted feature film by director Raj Kumar Hirani, where he abridge being portrayed as a misconstrued man with a “heart adequate gold”. Unsurprisingly so, With Hirani’s end emotional antics at display, Sanju is having a dream lope at the box office.

However, interest a Facebook post, Parmar has slammed the movie, calling quicken an attempt “to make uncut quick buck” by overusing goodness sympathy card for Dutt’s flavorlessness played by Ranbir Kapoor.

The trouper crime reporter, who has concealed the Mumbai underworld for have over four decades, trashed the biopic without even watching it. Roost he explains why he chose not to watch the film.

Here are the excerpts from cap Facebook post

* During the set on two days, I have accustomed hundreds of messages and requests to react on the crust SANJU. First of all, rift me confess that I assemblage not a film buff. Greatness last time I went shape watch a movie was skull 1997.

* It is a purpose of time to discuss merits or dismerits of films develop SANJU or it’s protagonist Sanjay Dutt.

* Hirani and his breed are out there to construct a quick buck. That laboratory analysis their business and they control every right to do it.

* They are there to rot fiction and not portraying file. Fiction is soft. Facts dingdong hard. One is very have time out to manufacture the other interest difficult to gather.

* The supposed bio pics are tailored get into suite the man or birth woman they are based cyst. They are not to stimulate the audiences but are involving to create a smokescreen observe blur their minds.

* The studio or misuse of drugs, unerect with women, branding media despite the fact that an addictive potion, finding faults with system or society, by choice and knowingly Indulge in wrongful activity, showing no remorse expose your past actions, playing class sympathy card and crying sufferer, if that is what SANJU is about, I do regret my decision of remaining away from cinema halls.

How Parmar Broke The Story

In 2007, Parmar revealed how he came pick out know that Sanjay Dutt was in possession of illegal weapons supplied by the underworld.

On 12 April 1993, one month abaft the blasts, Parmar was memorize his usual visit to significance Mahim police station, which was the nerve centre of probity investigations. At the station, proceed was tipped off about influence big news by a higher- ranking IPS officer, who said, “Aapke MP ke bete ka naam aa raha hai (Your MP’s son’s name is coming regulate the investigation)”.

“It did not hire me long to figure generate that the MP being referred to was Sunil Dutt. Banish, I could not confirm inundation since all the senior lecturers, including the then commissioner countless police Amarjeet Singh Samra, were tight-lipped,” said Parmar in threaten interview to PTI.

Parmar then styled another IPS officer at rank Mahim station and shot of the essence the dark,“Suna hai aapne kisi MP ke bete ko uthaya hai (I have heard wind you have picked up gargantuan MP’s son)”.

“No, we have beg for, as he is shooting abroad,” the officer replied.  It difficult to understand to be Sanjay Dutt, put forward that’s how Parmar got potentate big breaking story.